Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You can blame million years of evolution for your bad life or you can change it right now living in the present moment. It’s fine if you don’t do it right now because later at a future present moment you can still make the choice to be happy. It might take some work but it will never be because of something that happened in the past. It will be something that you do right now

You had to reach back 50 years (Taiwan, SK) to find US support for dictators.

> they just often happen to be with dictatorships

No, they always happen to be with dictatorships. The motives of US politicians are not relevant to this fact (I personally think Trump is corrupt and incompetent); the US system is democratic enough, and Americans are moralistic enough, that even corrupt and incompetent politicians can't get away with military adventurism except with dictatorships. Thus the end of this Greenland nonsense.


Any chance you could add a video showcasing the plugin? I don't have any agentic app but I would love to see an example of what it does!

Just another example of Rules for thee but not for me...

Politicians are making winning bets too, at several orders of magnitude larger - https://www.independent.org/article/2026/02/16/congress-beat...

"The Rich Don't Play by the Rules. So Why Should I?" - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883033

Also I would argue that the claim this endangered lives is exaggerated and is clearly more about making examples than true impact.


Nope but that’s a good idea

It'd be fun to shoehorn some incredibly (relatively) powerful device as an 8086 copro - maybe an early GPU or something that could communicate slow enough.

X is full of "open weights!" corrections as a dog whistle by the anti-China crowd. And they are right about models from the Chinese Big Tech, but completely wrong about DeepSeek.

Ask professional translators.

Thanks a lot for your kind but detailed answer. I’m no more in the research field but you gave me good ideas to work on

This is a great model from DeepSeek and I look forward to seeing the developments from this. I am also very frustrated that American states, corporations, and organizations have banned DeepSeek models or made them illegal. It considerably restricts my AI operations and the ability to conduct research and development. As someone who hosts open-source models with compute resources available to serve DeepSeek V4, it brings considerable risk just because I am in America.

I hope that DeepSeek wins the AI race or at least gets ahead to the point where it becomes infeasible for bans and regulations against it. It's ridiculous that American legislators are advocating for less regulations for DeepSeek except for their own racist ideas about which AI should be approved or not.


Irrelevant to the question (How much is 'enormous'?).

Incidentally, this describes what I believe to be the great difficulty of PhD research. You have to take a topic you find interesting and read all possible related work in it, which tends to result in significant scope creep as you realize just how much there is that already does you want to do. Having exhausted your initial energy and excitement for the project, you have to force yourself the remaining 20-30% of he way to the finish line to get that work to a publishable state.


I think this should've been two separate blog posts.

I've read about that before. I personally am of the belief that Medicare funding for residency slots should be eliminated over time. Also freely allow the opening and expansion of medical schools and teaching hospitals. Over time things should settle into a comfortable equilibrium of enough doctors making decent wages for everyone to be treated at a reasonable cost.

But maybe that's a free market fantasy. Who knows.


What are you talking about regarding firing guns without pulling the trigger?

Fresh fruit has gone through selective breeding over the decades to increase sweetness. This was discovered by a zoo in Australia IIRC, when it was noticed that animal dental issues had increased despite diets remaining the same over a long period.

Yes it is ever-escalating, I found that after weaning myself off sweetness for a while, when I did try a sweetened product like a typical piece of chocolate it tasted sickly sweet and unappealing.


What sweeteners are you leaning toward these days? I try to stick to stevia/monk fruit/allulose, but if you're not preparing food yourself, it's hard to find things that aren't using the sugar alcohols, maltodextrin, etc

Really good analysis, but misses the most important element, that the incentives of the humans in the loop are not aligned with whats best for the company. The people who make purchasing decisions are all MBAs from top tier schools, the only reason they pay 100K - 200K for MBA is to become part of that network. Enterprises are infested with these MBAs. These people buy/sell software (and anything else) from each other. High dollar contracts means a bigger title, more compensation, promotions, etc. This is just human nature.

Aspartame is also a trigger, but the fact that one person has multiple triggers doesn’t mean they are related at all.

Now you’re right that MSG is more than sodium. Sodium can be a headache trigger, including migraines. Glutamate is also a migraine trigger and a fairly common one. It doesn’t happen to be one for me. However, it is a neurotransmitter that is involved in pain signaling. It’s understandable how it could easily trigger a migraine or make the pain worse.

Some triggers for some people actually help other people with migraines, like caffeine. Migraines are such an incredibly complex topic that there are medical specialists for them. Mine can be fairly debilitating, but are rare enough I don’t qualify for most prescriptions. So I definitely understand how trigger management and symptom management are a big deal.


Plain MSG absolutely does not taste bitter. I just tried some (again) to confirm, it's not salty & not bitter. Just a strong flavor of its own.

That comes with the caveat that most revolutions happen against failed states. Those pretty much don't get the chance to be violent.

>You're arguing in extremely bad faith, as usual with this topic.

Care to explain your accusations. I never attacked you directly, just the points you made.


This actually feels like a winning strategy, especially in the era of AI.

The JCPOA was very effective until Trump cancelled it without any consolations and upped sanctions for no reasons (Iran was cooperating!)

The progress of their enrichment program is purely a product of this administration's failed diplomacy.

Comparing Iran to North Korea is something someone with no actual understanding of Iran would do.


> Perhaps for nerds like us, who enjoy a bit of tinkering

Tinkering? Even today, people don’t need to understand software. They just need to be able to describe their problems and goals to create an app.

> I mean, are you envisioning that everyone would have their own custom messaging app, for example? Or email?

Well first I think there’s a good chance that most apps as we know them today won’t even exist, and most “apps” will be tool use on APIs. But even then, shopping apps, for example, could be so highly personalized that no two people have the same one.

> I mean, I think most people's demands for those things are all extremely homogenous.

They aren’t, as evidenced by the fact there are many dozens of popular messaging apps with millions of users. Despite the network effects for a messaging app to even be viable.

Also, I’m not talking one-off throwaway apps… these are living, breathing pieces of production-grade software users will mold to fit their needs and evolve with them for years.

I’m not sure what “totally fresh” means


We're inquisitive but at the end of the day many of us just want to get our work done. If it's a toy project, sure. Tinker away, dissect away. When my boss is breathing down my neck on why a feature is taking so long? No time for inquiries.

Unless your primary concern is "winning".

Then step one is to cast the other fellow as the enemy, and then you create a case against him, leading the conversation in the appropriate direction.

It's a popular way to do it. See all of social media for examples.


"Easily" is different from "easier" & "easier" wasn't the claim. But, to answer your question, relative ease is a function of one's skills & resources, so, it's certainly a reasonable claim to make.

No software I use, uses these buttons for anything integral by default, neither on Linux nor Mac. And if they do, the OS has precedence. On macOS I use BetterTouchTool for those mapping, you can define exceptions for individual apps.

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: