Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tevon's commentslogin

What is the 28% failure rate, is that from the removal of strong typing? Love the idea!


It was basically an independent study by scalekit where they tried connecting an AI agent to GitHub. They tested methods through CLI and MCP and in MCPs, 28% (7/25) there were TCP connection timeout errors. It was mainly the time gap in remote server responding which led to this.


Dude there is nothing "far right" about him.

Way too broad a brush to paint with. If we want to retain any sort of liberal democracy we need to stop with the rhetoric that "if you're not as far in X direction as I am, you must be on the other side". Its destroying the democratic party.

I'm a staunch democrat, and this is just sad to see. Progressive and centrist should both be able to coexist. We should be able to call out ineffective policies within our own movement without being called far right radicals.


Tan does not believe in equal franchise.


Dude he's decrying "Marxists" online. The dog whistle can't be any louder, it's hurting my ears already.


This has been tried multiple times actually via ISAs and other instruments. Immediately inverts to adverse selection - eg the students who are going for a more lucrative option don't want to participate.

That said, the letter here wasn't about undergrad or expensive college - its about the federal government stripping funding for research for political reasons. Sad. We should be investing in US research capabilities. And like it or not, our research universities are pretty freaking good at... research.


We used to build great big crazy things too, lots via research universities due to vast federal and defense research.

That has changed. It should be reinstated. Cut red tape, get back into the business of taking (literal) moonshots as a government.


The CRDT enables eventual consistency on these schema updates, so a new field will be eventually consistent


This seems to miss the plot on so, so many points. Not worth a read if you came to the comment section first.

Doesn't even discuss open-source when a key point its making is "tech is built on the backs of others".


Tech here can refer to many things. Given the context stated in the article (and literally the title) I think it’s clear the author is talking about SV elites which by definition excludes most of the open source community. And no, a tech company releasing open source code doesn’t amount to much in the face of the firehouse of cash they print. But you should just stick your head back in the sand, it’ll feel better.


I have a late model Audi, and a Tesla Model 3. Audi has all the bells and whistles.

Doesn't come close to the safety I feel in the Tesla. Not even close. I know anecdotal


Design of these safety features for euro cars generally aims to be invisible unless active. You don't "feel" the car in control.


then the PR worked



Nice URL that is a win


My time to shine: https://z.gd


Being "pretty good" holds us back by atrophying our ability to handle hard things.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: