Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Better Linux connectivity.

Doesn't matter. No one uses Linux.

> Ability to easily copy files on and off the phone.

Doesn't matter. Everyone uses email for a file store.

> Ability to sync podcasts directly on the phone, without having to connect to a computer with iTunes (not used an iPhone for a while, they might have finally fixed this).

They fixed this, also, doesn't matter, no one listens to podcasts.

> Ability to run software Apple doesn't like (emulators).

Doesn't matter.

If you want to make an argument that Android is a better purchase option for mass market consumers, you'll need an argument that actually represents the mass market. I can't think of any argument, as Apple alternatives are always better: better media library, better app library, better product lifetime support (both in terms of software updates, product maintenance), better hardware, better (consistent) software, better branding. These are the things that matter to people.



> If you want to make an argument that Android is a better purchase option for mass market consumers, you'll need an argument that actually represents the mass market.

Who wants to do that? The thread parent post said "it is beyond me how anyone can argue that this is not the best smartphone on the market." That is very, very far from arguing which phone is the best option for mass market consumers. For someone running Linux, it is very easy to argue this is not the best smartphone on the market.


Resale value is also good for Apple kit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: