> We successfully scaled MongoDB from a few users a day to millions of queries an hour.
Uh, 1 query per second is 60x60x60=216000... Soo, 1 million queries per hour equals 4-5 queries per second.
Soo, that's not even at toy project level. That's extremely low scale, like the smallest possible instance small.
A consumer laptop does 20+k queries/seconds on postgres, mysql etc. a raspberry pi usually still gets 1-3k read queries/s, depending on the used SD card
(Or 432 million queries per second).
You're not instilling any kind of confidence quoting numbers like that
TBH we are at around 15M queries per hour. I am sure our customers don't want us to run on RPi. Btw, it's not only query but billion+ rows which are also there.
I expected as much, usually it's me pointing out that mongodb is a decent DB depending on the data you're ingesting/storing, and it's builtin clustering is significant better then what postgres offers at the moment.
But the number was so low I couldn't help but point out that this was more likely to convince me that mongo is a joke then a usable database
Uh, 1 query per second is 60x60x60=216000... Soo, 1 million queries per hour equals 4-5 queries per second.
Soo, that's not even at toy project level. That's extremely low scale, like the smallest possible instance small.
A consumer laptop does 20+k queries/seconds on postgres, mysql etc. a raspberry pi usually still gets 1-3k read queries/s, depending on the used SD card (Or 432 million queries per second).
You're not instilling any kind of confidence quoting numbers like that