Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why burn his own money when he can get VC money instead?


If he believes in the product he could have kept 100% of his company.


He kept 80%. The other 20% is owned by 8 different VCs. Seems like he's still in control. There's value in using other people's money instead of your own because it might make him less emotionally risk-averse in how he manages it.


100% of something without any measurable adoption or scale can suck.


Most of the time it's not about the money VCs send into it but the credibility that this brings. It looks a lot more mature when your idea is backed by a distribution of wealthy people.


The point is more - it's primary goal is not to enable developers to do more and better, it's primary goal is to _maximize shareholder value_. Important thing to keep in mind.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: